4.5 Article

Influence of Lewy Pathology on Alzheimer's Disease Phenotype: A Retrospective Clinico-Pathological Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
卷 63, 期 4, 页码 1317-1323

出版社

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-170914

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; Alzheimer's disease with amygdala Lewy bodies; braak stages; dementia with Lewy bodies; Lewy bodies; Lewy body variant of Alzheimer's disease; neurofibrillary tangles

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Studies have shown the frequent coexistence of Lewy pathology (LP) in Alzheimer's Disease (AD). Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the influence of LP on the clinical and cognitive phenotype in a cohort of patients with a neuropathological diagnosis of AD. Methods: We reviewed neuropathologically proven AD cases, reaching Braak stages V and VI in the brain banks of Lille and Paris between 1993 and 2016, and classified them according to LP extension (amygdala, brainstem, limbic, or neocortical). We then searched patient files for all available clinical and neuropsychiatric features and neuropsychological data. Results: Thirty-three subjects were selected for this study, among which 16 were devoid of LP and 17 presented AD with concomitant LP. The latter were stratified into two subgroups according to LP distribution: 7 were AD with amygdala LP and 10 were AD with 'classical' (brainstem, limbic or neocortical) LP. When analyzing the incidence of each clinical feature at any point during the disease course, we found no significant difference in symptom frequency between the three groups. However, fluctuations appeared significantly earlier in patients with classical LP (2 +/- 3.5 years) than in patients without LP (7 +/- 1.7 years) or with amygdala LP (8 +/- 2.8 years; p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in cognitive profiles. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the influence of LP on the clinical phenotype of AD is subtle. Core features of dementia with Lewy bodies do not allow clinical diagnosis of a concomitant LP on a patient-to-patient basis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据