4.7 Article

Influence of dual ceramic nanomaterials on the solderability and interfacial reactions between lead-free Sn-Ag-Cu and a Cu conductor

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 743, 期 -, 页码 300-313

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.02.017

关键词

Lead-free solder; Nanomaterials; Nanocomposite solder; Spreadability; IMC growth

资金

  1. Technology Innovation Program (or Industrial Strategic technology development program, Development and mass production of 25% reduced prices nano-micro compound Pb-free solder paste for automotive devices to respond to ELV Directive) - Ministry of Trade, i [10051436]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the addition of dual ceramic nanomaterials, TiO2 and graphene (0, 0.03, 0.12, 0.21, and 0.60 wt %), to a lead-free Sn-3.0 wt % Ag-0.5 wt % Cu (SAC305) solder alloy. TiO2 and graphene nanomaterials were mixed simultaneously at equal weight fractions into the SAC305 molten solder by mechanical mixing and melting to produce a bulk nanocomposite solder. The effects of the dual nanomaterials on the melting point, microstructure, solderability, and intermetallic compound (IMC) growth were conducted. The structural and morphological features of the samples were characterized by field emission scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive spectroscopy, and transmission electron microscopy. In addition, the melting behavior of the nanocomposite solder was characterized by differential scanning calorimetry. The nanocomposite solder with 0.21wt % nanomaterials showed 33.67% enhancement in wettability and an 8.66% increase in spreadability due to the increased fluidity and decreased surface tension of molten solder in the presence of dual nanomaterials. In addition, the thickness of the IMCs was reduced after adding the dual nanomaterials to the monolithic SAC alloy. The optimal concentration of the dual nanomaterials in the monolithic SAC alloy was found to be 0.21wt %. (c) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据