4.7 Article

Improvement of high-temperature fatigue performance in the nickel-based alloy by LSP-induced surface nanocrystallization

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 744, 期 -, 页码 156-164

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.01.070

关键词

Surface nanocrystallization; Laser shock peening; Residual stress; High-and-low cycle combined fatigue

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [51502346, 51405507]
  2. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [2017M623165]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province of China [2015JQ5171]
  4. National Basic Research Program of China [2015Cb057400]
  5. National Key Research and Development Plan [2016YFB1102600]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-temperature fatigue performance of turbine blades (material: nickel-based alloy) is improved by a surface nanocrystallization technology. Surface nanocrystallization characterized by XRD, SEM and TEM, can be achieved by laser shock peening (LSP). Different microstructures are observed at the depths along the direction of propagation of the shock wave. A layer of isometric 30-500 nm nanocrystalline (1-mu m-thick) is formed homogeneously at the surface of materials after LSP. With a heat treatment at 600 degrees C, the surface nanocrystals remain, while most of the residual compressive stresses are relaxed. The nanohardness of the deformed plastic layer (surface) is improved by a single laser shock impact, and an increase in the number of impacts improves the nanohardness amplitude. This nanohardness exhibits good stability against temperature, because of dislocation strengthening after thermal effect. The results of combined high-and-low cycle fatigue tests at 530 degrees C reveal that fatigue life of the turbine blades increased significantly by LSP, which are primarily associated with the effects such as surface nanocrystallization, high-density dislocation and residual compressive stress after thermal relaxation. (c) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据