4.7 Article

Effect of temperature and frequency on electrical properties of composite multiferroic of lead titanate and strontium hexaferrite (PbTiO3-SrFe12O19)

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 764, 期 -, 页码 599-615

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.06.071

关键词

Composite material; Solid state reaction; Dielectric response; X-ray diffraction; Grain boundary

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The work describes the use of dielectric and ac complex impedance and modulus spectroscopy techniques to obtain the electrical parameters like electrical conductivity and activation energy of composite multiferroic having composition (x) PbTiO3 - (1-x)SrFe12O19; where x = 0.10, 0.30, 0.50 in the frequency range 10-1000 KHz over a temperature range of 30-550 degrees C. The coexistence of low dielectric constant region with high dielectric constant region results in Maxwell - Wagner (M-W) polarization in the composite. Complex impedance and modulus spectroscopic analysis indicated the presence of non-Debye type dielectric relaxation in the composites. The grain (R-g) and space charge polarization resistance (R-SCP) decreases with increase in temperature providing convincing evidence that the electrical properties of composite are temperature as well as microstructure dependent. The ac conductivity of composite calculated from dielectric loss and it shows an increase with increasing temperature suggesting semiconductor behavior. The hopping rate and concentration of charge carriers was calculated using Almond and West formalism based on Jonscher's universal power law. The activation energy of the ion migration and conduction was determined from temperature dependence of the hopping rate and dc conductivity respectively. For all compositions, the activation energy of dc conductivity is greater than that of hopping; i.e., E-a > E-m. The increase in drift mobility represents enhanced mobility of the charge carriers due to thermal activation. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据