4.7 Article

Anisotropic mechanical behavior of biomedical Ti-13Nb-13Zr alloy manufactured by selective laser melting

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 762, 期 -, 页码 289-300

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.05.179

关键词

Selective laser melting; Anisotropic; Ti-13Nb-13Zr; Mechanical properties; Microstructure

资金

  1. Zhuzhou Printing Additive Manufacturing Co. LTD
  2. National Key Research and Development Program Additive Manufacturing and Laser Manufacturing [2016YFB1100101, 2017YFB0306305]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51571214, 51474245]
  4. Key Research Project of Hunan Province, China [2016JC2003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The anisotropic microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-13Nb-13Zr alloy via selective laser melting (SLM) are investigated for the first time in this study. Owing to the re-melting of the previous layer(s) and the thermal gradient, the prior 13 columnar grains grow in the building direction while scanning direction are mainly consist of finer equiaxed grains, which result in the higher nanohardness in horizontal section (5.18 +/- 0.2 GPa) than in vertical section (4.63 0.2 GPa). The as-fabricated longitudinal samples show slight higher ultimate tensile strength (UTS) (1020 +/- 15 MPa) and yield strength (YS) (794.63 +/- 15 MPa) than transverse samples (UTS of 996 +/- 13 MPa and YS of 794 +/- 15 MPa) because of the enhancement of twins in vertical section. The SLM processed samples show no element segregation because of the complete melting and repeatedly re-melting, and the refined microstructure due to the high cooling rate in SLM process, which make the tensile strength superior higher than those obtained by powder metallurgy (750 MPa). Owing to the columnar grain morphology, in building direction, the failure can be postponed, which results in the longitudinal samples (6.5 +/- 0.3%) exhibit higher ductility than transverse samples (5 +/- 0.3%). (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据