4.7 Article

Leaf-like interconnected network structure of MWCNT/Co9S8/S for lithium-sulfur batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 731, 期 -, 页码 964-970

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.10.115

关键词

Leaf-like interconnected network structure; MWCNT midribs; Polar Co9S8 leaves; Shuttle effect; Lithium-sulfur batteries

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21466036, 21666037]
  2. Nature Science Foundation of Xinjiang Province [2015211C286, 2017D01C074]
  3. Scientific and Technological Innovation Leading Talent Reserve of Xinjiang Province [wr2015cx02]
  4. Young Scholar Science Foundation of Xinjiang Educational Institutions [XJEDU2016S030]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lithium-sulfur batteries have several disadvantages, such as intrinsic insulation of sulfur and Li2S, large volume expansion, and inevitable shuttle effect, which lead to low utilization of active materials and rapid capacity decay. Herein, leaf-like interconnected network structure of MWCNT/Co9S8 was synthesized by a simple hydrothermal method. The MWCNT/Co9S8/S delivers a high specific capacity and good cycling stability. The initial discharge capacity of MWCNT/Co9S8/S is 1124 mAh g(-1) and retains at 503 mAh g(-1) after 100 cycles at 0.1 C. The improved electrochemical performance of MWCNT/Co9S8/S could be attributed to the interconnected network MWCNT and polar Co9S8. As conductive skeletons, the interconnected network structure of MWCNT midribs provide fast conduction paths for electron and additional space for volume expansion of sulfur. Furthermore, sulfur particles well-distributed on the MWCNT/Co9S8 scaffold facilitate Li+ ions storage and release for energy delivery, which is beneficial to excellent activation of sulfur and high rate capacity. In addition, the polar Co9S8 leaves provide strong binding sites to trap polar polysulfide intermediates, which can suppress the shuttle effect effectively. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据