4.7 Article

Magnetocaloric effect and critical behaviors of R2NiMnO6 (R=Eu and Dy) double perovskite oxides

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 746, 期 -, 页码 594-600

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.02.327

关键词

Ceramics; Magnetization; Magnetocaloric; Critical behavior

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFB0702702, 2016YFA0300701, 2015CB921403]
  2. National Natural Sciences Foundation of China [91622126, 51427801, 51471111]
  3. Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS [QYZDJ-SSW-JSC023]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have investigated the magnetocaloric effects and critical behaviors of Eu2NiMnO6 and Dy2NiMnO6 double perovskite oxides. For a magnetic field varying from 0 to 7 T, the maximum values of the magnetic entropy change (vertical bar Delta S-M(max)vertical bar) reach 4.0 J/kg K and 5.2 J/kg K, and the relative refrigeration capacity (RCP) values are 241.5 J/kg and 385.1 J/kg for Eu2NiMnO6 and Dy2NiMnO6, respectively. The relatively high values of vertical bar Delta S-M vertical bar and RCP suggest that these double perovskite oxides can be used as candidates of magnetic refrigerants working in a wide temperature range. Various techniques such as modified Arrott plot, Kouvel-Fisher method and critical isotherm analysis are used to estimate the critical exponents (beta, gamma and delta) as well as T-C for Eu2NiMnO6. These critical exponents not only obey the Widom scaling relation delta = 1 + gamma/beta, but also fulfill the scaling equation M(H, epsilon) = epsilon(beta)f(+/-) (H/epsilon(beta+gamma)) where epsilon = (T - TC)/T-C, f(+) (T > T-C) and f-(T < T-C) are the regular analytic functions. Therefore, the deduced critical exponents are reasonably accurate. Moreover, temperature variation in effective critical exponents resemble with those for disordered ferromagnet, which matches with the Griffiths-like phase behavior observed from inverse magnetic susceptibility just above T-C. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据