4.7 Article

Microstructures and immersion corrosion behavior of laser thermal sprayed amorphous Al-Ni coatings in 3.5 % NaCl solution

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 735, 期 -, 页码 1-12

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.11.054

关键词

Laser thermal spraying (LTS); Al-Ni coating; Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC); Residual stress; Corrosion mechanism

资金

  1. Key Research and Development Project of Jiangsu Province [BE2016052]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amorphous Al-Ni coating with the Al and Ni mass ratios of 3: 2, 3: 1 and 4: 1 was sprayed on S355 steel of offshore platforms using a laser thermal spraying (LTS). The surface-interface morphologies, chemical element distribution, phase compositions and crystallization temperature of the obtained amorphous Al coatings were analyzed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM), energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS), X-ray diffractometer (XRD), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), respectively. The immersion corrosion behaviors of the Al-Ni coatings in 3.5% NaCl solution for 720 h were investigated. The results shows that the Al-Ni coating is composed of Al-Fe alloy, AlCrFe2, Ni2MnAl and amorphous Ni-MnAl alloy, the metallurgical bonding is formed at the Al-Ni coating interface due to the diffusions of Al, Ni and Fe elements, and the tensile residual stress induced by LTS accelerated the crack expansion. The amorphous Al-Ni coatings have a certain amount of amorphous component at the crystallization temperature of similar to 510 degrees C. The laser thermal sprayed Al-Ni coating generates the dense oxide film immersed in NaCl solution, hindering the anion from entering, which improving the corrosion resistance of Al-Ni coatings. The electrochemical corrosion resistance of Al-Ni coatings with the Al and Ni mass ratios of 3: 2 and 4: 1 is better than that with the Al and Ni mass ratio of 3: 1, effectively improving the corrosion resistance of S355 steel. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据