4.7 Article

Magneto-dielectric studies on multiferroic composites of Pr doped CoFe2O4 and Yb doped PbZrTiO3

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 744, 期 -, 页码 453-462

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.01.403

关键词

Sol-gel; Phase transition; Ferroelectrics; Magneto-dielectric; Bi-quadratic coupling

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology, Government of India [SR/WOS-A/PM-1006/2015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multiferroic composites with remarkable magnetoelectric effect (ME) are unique candidates for multifunctional devices. This study focuses on the structural, dielectric, ferroelectric, magnetic and ME properties of ferromagnetic (Pr doped CoFe2O4) and ferroelectric (Yb doped PbZrTiO3) composites with the general formula x CoPr0.1Fe1.9O4- (1-x) Pb0.95Yb0.05Zr0.52Ti0.48O3 (x = 0.02, 0.05 and 0.1). The individual phases namely Pr doped CoFe2O4 (CFO) and Yb doped PbZrTiO3 (PZT) for the composites were synthesized by sol-gel auto combustion technique. The powder X-ray diffraction technique showed that the Yb doped PZT retains its tetragonal perovskite structure, while as Pr doped CFO possesses cubic spinel structure. The morphological studies showed a uniform distribution of grains of parent phases in the composites. The dielectric studies in the temperature range of 100-750 K at a selected frequency (100 kHz) revealed a diffused phase transition confirming a ferroelectric to paraelectric phase transition. The composites show well-saturated P-E loops. The room temperature magnetic studies exhibit saturated M-H loops, with dilution of magnetic parameters for the composite. A favorable decrease in magneto-crystalline anisotropy calculated by Law of Approach was observed with decreasing ferrite content in the composite. The magneto-dielectric studies at room temperature confirm a negative magnetoelectric coupling in the composite. The Landau free energy approach confirmed a bi-quadratic coupling in the composites. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据