3.8 Article

An evaluation of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) health education in pharmacy school curricula

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cptl.2014.08.001

关键词

Pharmacy; Education; Curriculum; LGBThealth

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) community has increased health risks, including higher rates of certain cancers, depression, tobacco use, and substance abuse. These individuals are less likely to seek medical treatment and have higher rates of dissatisfaction with the health care system. It is unclear to what extent pharmacy school curricula prepare students to provide quality care to this population. Objective: The objective of this study is to describe to what extent LGBT health content is integrated in the pharmacy curricula. Methods: Between November 2011 and January 2012, curriculum Deans (or equivalent) from schools of pharmacy throughout the US were invited to complete a 14-item questionnaire to report the amount of LGBT health content taught in their respective schools. Results: A total of 28 schools (n = 125, 22%) responded. Of the 28 respondents, 43% reported having LGBT content in the required curriculum, with 39% reporting one to three hours and 4% reporting four to ten hours. The topics most frequently taught by schools were human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in LGBT people (71%) and sexually transmitted infections (non-HIV) (46%). Faculty development for teaching LGBT health content was provided by 18% of schools. The coverage of LGBT content was rated as good or very good by 14% and very poor by 32% of respondents. Conclusions: A review of how the schools of pharmacy curricula include LBGT health content is needed. We suggest strategies and resources that may help prepare faculty to teach LGBT health content and assist curriculum committees to integrate this material into the pharmacy curricula. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据