4.7 Article

Ultra-low hysteresis electrostrictive strain with high thermal stability in Bi(Li0.5Nb0.5)O-3-modified BaTiO3 lead-free ferroelectrics

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 753, 期 -, 页码 558-565

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.04.257

关键词

Electrostrictive; Strain; Thermal stability; BT; Lead-free ferroelectrics

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [51772239, 61404106, 11574246, 51761145024]
  2. Joint Fund of the Ministry of Education [6141A02033210]
  3. Natural Science Basis Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China [2015JM5199, 2017JM5016]
  4. fund of the State Key Laboratory of Solidification Processing in NWPU [SKLSP201709]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (XJTU)
  6. doctoral starting fund of Xi'an University of Technology [101-256211306]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electric-field-induced strain is often generated in piezoceramics, in which domain wall motion inherently results in hysteresis and energy dissipation, and subsequently affects the design and performance of actuators. Here, we proposed a strategy to search for electric-field-induced strain with low hysteresis and high thermal stability in electrostrictive materials based on thermal stability consistency between strain S-3 and dielectric constant epsilon(r). According to this strategy, we reported an ultra-low hysteresis (<10%) S-3 with high thermal stability (Delta S/S-30 <= 25%, S-30 means the maximum strain S-max measured at 30 degrees C) and high electrostrictive coefficient Q(33) (similar to 0.037-0.049 m(4)/C-2) in Bi(Li0.5Nb0.5)O-3-modified BaTiO3 (BT-xBLN) lead-free ferroelectrics with x = 0.08 from 30 degrees C to 120 degrees C, due to the high thermal stability of epsilon(r). This work would not only report an important candidate for applications in high-precision actuators, but also supply a novel strategy for electrostrictive materials to increase the strain level with high thermal stability. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据