4.3 Article

Premorbid risk factors for major depressive disorder: Are they associated with early onset and recurrent course?

期刊

DEVELOPMENT AND PSYCHOPATHOLOGY
卷 26, 期 4, 页码 1477-1493

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0954579414001151

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAAA NIH HHS [R01 AA009367, R01 AA011886, R37 AA009367] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDA NIH HHS [U01DA024417, R01 DA013240, R37 DA005147, U01 DA024417, R01DA013240, R37DA005147] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH066140, T32 MH015755, R01MH066140] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Premorbid risk for major depressive disorder (MDD) and predictors of an earlier onset and recurrent course were examined in two studies in a large, community-based sample of parents and offspring, prospectively assessed from late childhood into adulthood. In Study 1 (N = 2,764 offspring and their parents), parental psychiatric status, offspring personality at age 11, and age 11 offspring internalizing and externalizing symptoms predicted the subsequent development of MDD, as did poor quality parent-child relationships, poor academic functioning, early pubertal development, and childhood maltreatment by age 11. Parental MDD and adult antisocial behavior, offspring negative emotionality and disconstraint, externalizing symptoms, and childhood maltreatment predicted an earlier onset of MDD, after accounting for course; lower positive emotionality, trait anxiety, and childhood maltreatment predicted recurrent MDD, after accounting for age of onset. In Study 2 (N = 7,146), we examined molecular genetic risk for MDD by extending recent reports of associations with glutamatergic system genes. We failed to confirm associations with MDD using either individual single nucleotide polymorphism based tests or gene-based analyses. Overall, results speak to the pervasiveness of risk for MDD, as well as specific risk for early onset MDD; risk for recurrent MDD appears to be largely a function of its often earlier onset.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据