4.7 Article

Substantial Enhancement of the Antioxidant Capacity of an alpha-Linolenic Acid Loaded Microemulsion: Chemical Manipulation of the Oil-Water Interface by Carbon Dots and Its Potential Application

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 66, 期 26, 页码 6917-6925

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b01991

关键词

microemulsion; antioxidant capacity; interfacial microstructure; chemical manipulation; potential application

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21676196]
  2. Tianjin Municipal Natural Science Foundation [17JCYBJC20400]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Various active ingredients play a crucial role in providing and supplementing the nutritional requirements of organisms. In this work, we attempted to chemically manipulate the interfacial microstructure of oil-water microemulsions (ME) with carbon dots (CDs), concentrating on substantially enhancing the antioxidant capacity of alpha-linolenic acid (ALA). To this end, CDs were synthesized and introduced into an ME. The molecular interaction of surfactant with CDs was investigated by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The microstructure of the ME was monitored by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM). The cryo-EM result showed the oil-water interface in the ME was better defined after the CDs were loaded, and H-1 NMR proved the CDs were distributed mainly at the interface. On the basis of these results, interfacial models were proposed. Final evaluation results demonstrated the stabilizing effect and oxidation-inhibition ability of the ALA-loaded ME was substantially enhanced after the introduction of the CDs, indicating a turn off effect of the interface. Interestingly, CDs do not affect the in vitro release of ALA, indicating a turn on effect of the interface. This work provided a successful interface manipulation with a nanocarrier that can be used for a large diversity of food nutraceuticals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据