4.7 Article

Coencapsulation of (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate and Quercetin in Particle-Stabilized W/O/W Emulsion Gels: Controlled Release and Bioaccessibility

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 66, 期 14, 页码 3691-3699

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b05161

关键词

Pickering stabilization; W/O/W emulsions; emulsion gels; protein nanoparticles; controlled release; bioaccessibilily

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31601468, 21766018]
  2. Major Discipline Academic, Technical Leader Training Plan Project of Jiangxi Province, China [20162BCB22009]
  3. Key Project of Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province, China [20171ACB20005]
  4. Postgraduate Innovation Fund of Jiangxi Province, China [YC2017-B010]
  5. Open Project Program of State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, NanChang University [SKLF-ZZB-201717]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Particle-stabilized W-1/O/W-2 emulsion gels were fabricated using a two-step procedure: (i) a W-1/O emulsion was formed containing saccharose (for osmotic stress balance) and gelatin (as a gelling agent) in the aqueous phase and polyglycerol polyricinoleate (a lipophilic surfactant) in the oil phase; (ii) this W-1/O emulsion was then homogenized with another water phase (W-2) containing wheat gliadin nanoparticles (hydrophilic emulsifier). The gliadin nanoparticles in the external aqueous phase aggregated at pH 5.5, which led to the formation of particle-stabilized W-1/O/W-2 emulsion gels with good stability to phase separation. These emulsion gels were then used to coencapsulate a hydrophilic bioactive (epigallocatechin-3-gallate, EGCG) in the internal aqueous phase (encapsulation efficiency = 65.5%) and a hydrophobic bioactive (quercetin) in the oil phase (encapsulation efficiency = 97.2%). The emulsion gels improved EGCG chemical stability and quercetin solubility under simulated gastrointestinal conditions, which led to a 2- and 4-fold increase in their effective bioaccessibility, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据