4.7 Article

Evidence for association between familial bipolar risk and ventral striatal volume

期刊

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
卷 232, 期 -, 页码 69-72

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.02.015

关键词

Bipolar; Major depressive disorder; Genetic risk; Striatum; MRI; Freesurfer

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust Strategic Award [503147]
  2. Cardiff University Wellcome Trust Intuitional Strategic Support Funds [513688]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of striatal volumes and bipolar disorder (BD) indicate these traits are heritable and share common genetic architecture, however little independent work has been conducted to help establish this relationship. Methods: Subcortical volumes (mm(3)) of young, healthy offspring of BD (N=32) and major depressive disorder (MDD) patients (N=158) were compared to larger healthy control sample (NRANGE=925-1052) adjusting for potential confounds, using data from the latest release (S1200) of the Human Connectome Project. Based on recent GWAS findings, it was hypothesised that the accumbens and caudate would be smaller in offspring of BD, but not MDD patients. Results: After multiple comparison correction, there was a regional and BD specific relationship in the direction expected (Accumbens: F2,1067=6.244, PFDR-CORRECTED=0.014). Discussion: In line with recent GWAS, there was evidence supporting the hypothesis that reduced striatal volume may be part of the genetic risk for BD, but not MDD. Limitations: It cannot be concluded whether this association was specific to BD or consistent with a broader psychosis phenotype, due to a small sample size for offspring of schizophrenia patients. Furthermore, one cannot rule out potential shared environmental influences of parental BD. Conclusions: The common genetic architecture of BD may confer susceptibility via inherited genetic factors that affect striatal volume. Future work should establish how this relationship relates to specific BD symptomology. This work may also help to dissect clinical heterogeneity and improve diagnosis nosology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据