4.7 Article

CONSTRAINING THE LOW-MASS SLOPE OF THE STAR FORMATION SEQUENCE AT 0.5 < z < 2.5

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 795, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/795/2/104

关键词

-

资金

  1. NASA Post-doctoral Program at the Goddard Space Flight Center
  2. NASA [NAS5-26555, HST-GO-12177, HST-GO-12328, N00181]
  3. 3D-HST Treasury Program [GO 12177, 12328]
  4. NWO Spinoza grant
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/F002300/1, ST/I00162X/1, ST/H008519/1, ST/I001166/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. STFC [ST/H008519/1, ST/I00162X/1, ST/I001166/1, ST/F002300/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We constrain the slope of the star formation rate (SFR; log Psi) to stellar mass (logM(star)) relation down to log(M-star/M-circle dot) = 8.4 (log(M-star/M-circle dot) = 9.2) at z = 0.5 (z = 2.5) with a mass-complete sample of 39,106 starforming galaxies selected from the 3D-HST photometric catalogs, using deep photometry in the CANDELS fields. For the first time, we find that the slope is dependent on stellar mass, such that it is steeper at low masses (log Psi proportional to logM(star)) than at high masses (log Psi proportional to (0.3-0.6) logM(star)). These steeper low-mass slopes are found for three different star formation indicators: the combination of the ultraviolet (UV) and infrared (IR), calibrated from a stacking analysis of Spitzer/MIPS 24 mu m imaging; beta-corrected UV SFRs; and Ha SFRs. The normalization of the sequence evolves differently in distinct mass regimes as well: for galaxies less massive than log(M-star/M-circle dot) < 10 the specific SFR (Psi/M-star) is observed to be roughly self-similar with Psi/M-star proportional to (1 + z)(1.9), whereas more massive galaxies show a stronger evolution with Psi/M-star proportional to (1 + z)(2.2-3.5) for log(M-star/M-circle dot) = 10.2-11.2. The fact that we find a steep slope of the star formation sequence for the lower mass galaxies will help reconcile theoretical galaxy formation models with the observations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据