4.4 Article

Evaluation of a gelatin-based adhesive for historic paintings that incorporates citronella oil as an eco-friendly biocide

期刊

JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 32, 期 21, 页码 2320-2349

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01694243.2018.1477411

关键词

Gelatin-based adhesive; glycerol; citronella oil; biocide; plasticizer; consolidant

资金

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Economia, Industria y Competitividad (MINECO)
  2. Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (ERDF)
  3. Agencia Estatal de Investigacion (AEI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The presented study focuses on evaluating the efficiency of a gelatin-based product that incorporates a plasticizer (glycerol) and a biocide (citronella oil), proposed as an eco-friendly adhesive for polychrome decoration applied in different parts of the architectural complex of the Longshan Temple in Lukang (eighteenth century, Taiwan). Seven laboratory physico-chemical tests were performed: (a) viscosity measurement; (b) drying curves; (c) moisture content determination; (d) water vapor permeability test; (e) mechanical test; (f) adhesion test; (g) susceptibility to fungi colonization test, which provide information on the workability, water content and water barrier properties, as well as mechanical, adhesion, and the biocide properties of the proposed product. The obtained results indicate that the workability, mechanical and adhesive properties of the new adhesive are adequate. Permeability in polychromies is slightly reduced due to the additional barrier effect of the adhesive incorporated into the paint film. The efficiency of citronella oil for preventing the growth of fungus Aspergillus niger on paintings consolidated with the adhesive was also probed. In parallel to these laboratory trials, the micro-invasive tests carried out, using nanoindentation combined with atomic force microscopy (NI-AFM), provided direct evidence for the improvement in the mechanical properties induced by applying the new adhesive to the original polychromies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据