4.6 Article

THE VERY FAINT END OF THE UV LUMINOSITY FUNCTION OVER COSMIC TIME: CONSTRAINTS FROM THE LOCAL GROUP FOSSIL RECORD

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
卷 794, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/794/1/L3

关键词

dark ages, reionization, first stars; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: high-redshift; galaxies: luminosity function, mass function; Local Group

资金

  1. NASA - Space Telescope Science Institute [HST-HF-51331.01]
  2. National Science Foundation [PHYS-1066293]
  3. MPIA
  4. Packard and Sloan Foundation Fellowships

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a new technique to estimate the evolution of the very faint end of the UV luminosity function (LF) out to z similar to 5. Measured star formation histories (SFHs) from the fossil record of Local Group (LG) galaxies are used to reconstruct the LF down to M-UV similar to -5 at z similar to 5 and M-UV similar to -1.5 at z < 1. Such faint limits are well beyond the current observational limits and are likely to remain beyond the limits of next-generation facilities. The reconstructed LFs, when combined with direct measurements of the LFs at higher luminosity, are well-fit by a standard Schechter function with no evidence of a break to the faintest limits probed by this technique. The derived faint-end slope, alpha, steepens from approximate to-1.2 at z < 1 to approximate to-1.6 at 4 < z < 5. We test the effects of burstiness in the SFHs and find the recovered LFs to be only modestly affected. Incompleteness corrections for the faintest LG galaxies and the (unlikely) possibility of significant luminosity-dependent destruction of dwarf galaxies between high redshift and the present epoch are important uncertainties. These and other uncertainties can be mitigated with more detailed modeling and future observations. The reconstructed faint end LF from the fossil record can therefore be a powerful and complementary probe of the high-redshift faint galaxies believed to play a key role in the reionization of the universe.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据