4.7 Article

A remote sensing-based model of tidal marsh aboveground carbon stocks for the conterminous United States

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.03.019

关键词

Tidal marsh biomass; Aboveground carbon stocks; Plant functional type; National greenhouse gas inventory; Multispectral imagery; C-band synthetic aperture radar

资金

  1. CALFED Science Program as part of the Integrated Regional Wetland Monitoring (IRWM) [4600002970]
  2. California Bay-Delta Authority Science [1037]
  3. National Science Foundation Long-Term Research in Environmental Biology Program [DEB-0950080, DEB-1457100, DEB-1557009]
  4. Department of Energy Terrestrial Ecosystem Science Program [DE-FG02-97ER62458, DE-SC0008339]
  5. National Science Foundation through the Florida Coastal Everglades Long -Term Ecological Research program [DEB-9910514, DBI-0620409, DEB-1237517]
  6. NASA New Investigator Program in Earth Sciences award [NNH10A0861]
  7. NASA Applied Sciences Program Ecological Forecasting award [NNH14AX161]
  8. NASA Carbon Monitoring System Program [NNH14AY671]
  9. USGS LandCarbon Program
  10. USGS Land Change Science Program
  11. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0008339] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Remote sensing based maps of tidal marshes, both of their extents and carbon stocks, have the potential to play a key role in conducting greenhouse gas inventories and implementing climate mitigation policies. Our objective was to generate a single remote sensing model of tidal marsh aboveground biomass and carbon that represents nationally diverse tidal marshes within the conterminous United States (CONUS). We developed the first calibration-grade, national-scale dataset of aboveground tidal marsh biomass, species composition, and aboveground plant carbon content (%C) from six CONUS regions: Cape Cod, MA, Chesapeake Bay, MD, Everglades, FL, Mississippi Delta, LA, San Francisco Bay, CA, and Puget Sound, WA. Using the random forest machine learning algorithm, we tested whether imagery from multiple sensors, Sentinel-1 C-band synthetic aperture radar, Landsat, and the National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP), can improve model performance. The final model, driven by six Landsat vegetation indices and with the soil adjusted vegetation index as the most important (n = 409, RMSE = 310 g/m2, 10.3% normalized RMSE), successfully predicted biomass for a range of marsh plant functional types defined by height, leaf angle and growth form. Model results were improved by scaling field-measured biomass calibration data by NAIP-derived 30 m fraction green vegetation. With a mean plant carbon content of 44.1% (n = 1384, 95% C.I. = 43.99%-44.37%), we generated regional 30 m aboveground carbon density maps for estuarine and palustrine emergent tidal marshes as indicated by a modified NOAA Coastal Change Analysis Program map. We applied a multivariate delta method to calculate uncertainties in regional carbon densities and stocks that considered standard error in map area, mean biomass and mean %C. Louisiana palustrine emergent marshes had the highest C density (2.67 +/- 0.004 Mg/ha) of all regions, while San Francisco Bay brackish/saline marshes had the highest C density of all estuarine emergent marshes (2.03 +/- 0.004 Mg/ha). Estimated C stocks for predefined jurisdictional areas ranged from 1023 +/- 39 Mg in the Nisqually National Wildlife Refuge in Washington to 507,761 +/- 14,822 Mg in the Terrebonne and St. Mary Parishes in Louisiana. This modeling and data synthesis effort will allow for aboveground C stocks in tidal marshes to be included in the coastal wetland section of the U.S. National Greenhouse Gas Inventory. With the increased availability of free post-processed satellite data, we provide a tractable means of modeling tidal marsh aboveground biomass and carbon at the global extent as well. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Inc. (ISPRS).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据