4.8 Article

Iron and phosphorus deprivation induce sociality in the marine bloom-forming cyanobacterium Trichodesmium

期刊

ISME JOURNAL
卷 12, 期 7, 页码 1682-1693

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41396-018-0073-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. Israel Science Foundation [373/16]
  2. Roy J. Zuckerberg Career Development Chair for Water Research
  3. Schulich Ocean Studies Centre Initiative at Dalhousie University
  4. MOST Israel
  5. High Council for Science and Technology (HCST), France
  6. Mediterranean Sea Research Center of Israel (MERCI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Trichodesmium spp. are diazotrophic cyanobacteria that exist as single filaments (trichomes) and as macroscopic colonies of varying shapes formed by aggregating trichomes. The causes and dynamics of colony formation and disassociation are not yet elucidated. we demonstrate that limited availability of dissolved phosphorus (P) or iron (Fe) stimulated trichome mobility and induced colony formation in Trichodesmium erythraeum IMS101 cultures. The specific nutrient limitation differentially affected the rate of colony formation and morphology of the colonies. Fe starvation promoted rapid colony formation (10-48 h from depletion) while 5-7 days were required for colonies to form in P-depleted cultures. Video analyses confirmed that the probability of trichomes to cluster increased from 12 to 35% when transferred from nutrient replete to Fe-depleted conditions. Moreover, the probability for Fe-depleted aggregates to remain colonial increased to 50% from only 10% in nutrient replete cultures. These colonies were also characterized by stronger attachment forces between the trichomes. Enrichment of nutrient-depleted cultures with the limited nutrient-stimulated colony dissociation into single trichomes. We postulate that limited P and Fe availability enhance colony formation of Trichodesmium and primarily control the abundance and distribution of its different morphologies in the nutrient-limited surface ocean.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据