4.7 Article

Modified kernel principal component analysis using double-weighted local outlier factor and its application to nonlinear process monitoring

期刊

ISA TRANSACTIONS
卷 72, 期 -, 页码 218-228

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.isatra.2017.09.015

关键词

Nonlinear process monitoring; Kernel principal component analysis; Local outlier factor; Double weighting strategy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61403418, 21606256]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China [ZR2014FLO16, ZR2016FQ21, ZR2016BQ14]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China [17CX02054]
  4. Applied Basic Research Programs of Qingdao City, China [16-5-1-10-jch]
  5. Postgraduate Innovation Project of China University of Petroleum [YCX2017058]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traditional kernel principal component analysis (KPCA) based nonlinear process monitoring method may not perform well because its Gaussian distribution assumption is often violated in the real industrial processes. To overcome this deficiency, this paper proposes a modified KPCA method based on double weighted local outlier factor (DWLOF-KPCA). In order to avoid the assumption of specific data distribution, local outlier factor (LOF) is introduced to construct two LOF-based monitoring statistics, which are used to substitute for the traditional T-2 and SPE statistics, respectively. To provide better online monitoring performance, a double-weighted LOF method is further designed, which assigns the weights for each component to highlight the key components with significant fault information, and uses the moving window to weight the historical statistics for reducing the drastic fluctuations in the monitoring results. Finally, simulations on a numerical example and the Tennessee Eastman (TE) benchmark process are used to demonstrate the superiority of the proposed DWLOF-KPCA method. (C) 2017 ISA. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据