4.7 Article

KECK-I MOSFIRE SPECTROSCOPY OF COMPACT STAR-FORMING GALAXIES AT z ≳ 2: HIGH VELOCITY DISPERSIONS IN PROGENITORS OF COMPACT QUIESCENT GALAXIES

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 795, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/795/2/145

关键词

galaxies: high-redshift; galaxies: photometry; galaxies: starburst

资金

  1. NASA through a grant from the Space Telescope Science Institute [HST-GO-12060]
  2. Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Incorporated, under NASA [NAS5-26555]
  3. NSF [AST-08-08133]
  4. KASI-Yonsei Joint Research Program for the Frontiers of Astronomy and Space Science - Space Science Institute
  5. [AYA2012-31277-E]
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  7. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [0808133] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present Keck-I MOSFIRE near-infrared spectroscopy for a sample of 13 compact star-forming galaxies (SFGs) at redshift 2 <= z <= 2.5 with star formation rates of SFR similar to 100M(circle dot)yr(-1) and masses of log( M/M-circle dot) similar to 10.8. Their high integrated gas velocity dispersions of sigma(int) = 230(-30)(+40)km s(-1), as measured from emission lines of Ha and [O III], and the resultant M-star-sigma(int) relation and M-star-M-dyn all match well to those of compact quiescent galaxies at z similar to 2, as measured from stellar absorption lines. Since log( M-star/M-dyn)= -0.06 +/- 0.2 dex, these compact SFGs appear to be dynamically relaxed and evolved, i.e., depleted in gas and dark matter (<13(-13)(+17)%), and present larger sint than their non-compact SFG counterparts at the same epoch. Without infusion of external gas, depletion timescales are short, less than similar to 300 Myr. This discovery adds another link to our new dynamical chain of evidence that compact SFGs at z greater than or similar to 2 are already losing gas to become the immediate progenitors of compact quiescent galaxies by z similar to 2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据