4.6 Article

Feasibility of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Low-Dose Gadolinium Comparative Performance With Standard Dose in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis

期刊

INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY
卷 53, 期 10, 页码 609-615

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000466

关键词

prostate cancer; DCE-MRI; low dose; Gadolinium; contrast agent

资金

  1. Philips Healthcare
  2. National Institutes of Health [NIH R01 CA172801, NIH 1S10OD018448-01, NIH R01CA218700, 5 P30 CA014599-36]
  3. National Institutes of Health (University of Chicago Institute of Translational Medicine)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: This study investigates whether administration of low doses of gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) for dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be as effective as a standard dose in distinguishing prostate cancer (PCa) from benign tissue. In addition, we evaluated the combination of kinetic parameters from the low- and high-dose injection as a new diagnostic marker. Materials and Methods: Patients (n = 17) with histologically confirmed PCa underwent preoperative 3 T MRI. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI images were acquired at 8.3-second temporal resolution with a low dose (0.015 mmol/kg) and close to the standard dose (0.085 mmol/kg) of gadobentate dimeglumine bolus injections. Low-dose images were acquired for 3.5 minutes, followed by a 5-minute gap before acquiring standard dose images for 8.3 minutes. The data were analyzed qualitatively to investigate whether lesions could be detected based on early focal enhancement and quantitatively by fitting signal intensity as a function of time with an empirical mathematical model to obtain a maximum enhancement projection (MEP) and signal enhancement rate (alpha). Results: Both low- and standard-dose DCE-MRI showed similar sensitivity (13/26 - 50%) and lesion conspicuity score (4.0 +/- 1.0 vs 4.2 +/- 0.9; P - 0.317) for PCa diagnosis on qualitative analysis. Prostate cancer showed significantly increased compared with benign tissue for low (9.98 +/- 5.84 vs 5.12 +/- 2.95 s(-1)) but not for standard (4.27 +/- 2.20 vs 3.35 +/- 1.48 s(-1)) dose. The ratio of low-dose alpha to standard-dose alpha was significantly greater (P = 0.02) for PCa (2.8 +/- 2.3) than for normal prostate (1.6 +/- 0.9), suggesting changes in water exchange and T2* effects associated with cancer. In addition, decreases in the percentage change in T1 relaxation rate as a function of increasing contrast media concentration (ie, the saturation effect) can also contribute to the observed differences in high-dose and low-dose alpha. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for differentiating PCa from benign tissue using alpha was higher for low dose (0.769) compared with standard dose (0.625). There were no significant differences between MEP calculated for PCa and normal tissue at the low and standard doses. Moderate significant Pearson correlation for DCE parameters, MEP (r = 0.53) and alpha(r = 0.58), was found between low and standard doses of GBCA. Conclusions: These preliminary results suggest that DCE-MRI with a low GBCA dose distinguishes PCa from benign prostate tissue more effectively than does the standard GBCA dose, based on signal enhancement rate. Diagnostic accuracy is similar on qualitative assessment. Prostate cancer diagnosis may be feasible with DCE-MRI with low-dose GBCA. In addition, comparison of enhancement kinetics after low and high doses of contrast media may provide diagnostically useful information.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据