4.4 Article

Change in kidney function after unilateral adrenalectomy in patients with primary aldosteronism: identification of risk factors for decreased kidney function

期刊

INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY
卷 50, 期 10, 页码 1887-1895

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11255-018-1887-9

关键词

Adrenalectomy; Chronic kidney disease; Glomerular filtration rate; Primary aldosteronism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) has been reported to decrease after unilateral adrenalectomy in patients with primary aldosteronism (PA). The aim of this study was to identify clinical predictors for decreased GFR after adrenalectomy in patients with PA. Methods The records of 187 patients (98 patients with PA and 89 with non-PA adrenal disease) who were followed up for at least 6months after unilateral adrenalectomy were retrospectively analyzed. Estimated GFR (eGFR) was investigated at 1, 3, and 6months postoperatively. Preoperative risk factors for eGFR% decline at 1month ([preoperative eGFR-eGFR at 1 month]/preoperative eGFRx100) and postoperative CKD development were investigated. Results The eGFR decreased significantly at 1 month and remained stable in the PA group. However, there were no significant changes in eGFR in the non-PA group over the 6-month period. In the PA group, a high preoperative eGFR and high aldosterone to renin ratio (ARR) were independently associated with eGFR% decline at 1 month. In patients with PA but without preoperative CKD (n=68), a low preoperative eGFR and high ARR were independent risk factors for developing postoperative CKD. The best preoperative cut-off values of eGFR and ARR for predicting the development of postoperative CKD were <= 102ml/min/1.73m(2) and >= 448ng/dl:ng/ml/h, respectively. Conclusions Renal function deteriorated significantly after unilateral adrenalectomy in patients with PA. Clinicians must pay attention to postoperative renal function in PA patients at elevated risk of developing decreased kidney function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据