4.3 Article

Tuberculosis-associated mortality and its risk factors in a district of Shanghai, China: a retrospective cohort study

出版社

INT UNION AGAINST TUBERCULOSIS LUNG DISEASE (I U A T L D)
DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.17.0726

关键词

TB; mortality; survival analysis; risk factor; rapid detection

资金

  1. Putuo District Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Shanghai, China) [PJK2013004]
  2. National Science and Technology Major Project of China [2018ZX10715012]
  3. Fourth Round of a Three Years Action Plan for Public Health of Shanghai [GWTD2015S02, 15GWZK080]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

SETTING: Pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) causes a considerable number of deaths in China; however, the factors related to mortality are not well known. OBJECTIVE: To determine mortality among PTB patients and to explore its risk factors in Shanghai, China. DESIGN: This was a retrospective population-based study. A cohort of PTB patients who initiated treatment in a district of Shanghai from 2004 to 2015 was evaluated. Mortality in PTB patients was studied using the standardised mortality ratio (SMR) and Cox's proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Of 2741 PTB patients recruited in our study, 394 (14.4%) died during the 12-year follow-up. The summarised SMR was 2.8, and death was most likely to occur during the first months of anti-tuberculosis treatment. Age >60 years (adjusted hazard ratio aHR] 4.039, P < 0.001), male sex (aHR 1.603, P < 0.001), sputum smear test positivity (aHR 1.945, P < 0.001), multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB; aHR 3.502, P = 0.001), diabetes mellitus (aHR 1.422, P = 0.012), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (aHR 2.505, P < 0.001) and having cancer (aHR 4.319, P < 0.001) were risk factors for PTB mortality. CONCLUSION: The overall mortality in PTB patients was higher than that in the general population. MDRTB and comorbidity were the two leading risk factors for mortality in PTB patients. Early, accurate diagnosis, together with comprehensive management and treatment, can reduce the mortality rate in PTB patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据