4.7 Article

Active thermography testing and data analysis for the state of conservation of panel paintings

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCES
卷 126, 期 -, 页码 143-151

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2017.12.036

关键词

Active thermography; Thermographic data processing; Non-destructive testing; Cultural heritage; Heat transfer; Statistical analysis

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, ROC [MOST 105-2628-E-007-013-MY2]
  2. Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Government of Spain) by human resource program [IJCI-2015-24492]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The restoration of Cultural Heritage wouldn't be possible without the financial resources to meet Cultural Heritage needs. A smart procedure to reduce in time and funds spent for restoration is linked to a planning of the diagnostic interventions acting to predict incipient defects undetectable to the naked eye. One of the main methods to fulfil this task is infrared thermography (IRT). The aim of this study is to examine the efficiency of various mathematical techniques in thermographic data processing, with respect to the thermal excitation procedure and the type of artificial defect in a panel painting sample. One of the thermographic analyses performed was based on the pixelwise algorithm for time-derivative of temperature (PATDT). With this algorithm, Newton's cooling law was applied pixel per pixel, resulting in the computation of the cooling rate of each pixel. In addition, the capabilities of the multivariate statistical analysis methods, independent component thermography (ICT) and sparse principal component thermography (SPCT) were also investigated. In the present case study, the authors inspected possible pathologies resembling splitting areas (Le., detachments) in real panel paintings, with the consequent change in the heat transfer coefficient and the heat capacity. The feasibility of the different analysis methods was illustrated with the application results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据