4.4 Article

Metschnikowia maroccana f.a., sp nov., a new yeast species associated with floral nectar from Morocco

出版社

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002784

关键词

flower-associated yeasts; host plant; Metschnikowia; nectar; novel species; yeast ecology

资金

  1. Fundacion BBVA (I Convocatoria de Ayudas a Investigadores, Innovadores y Creadores Culturales)
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [the Severo Ochoa Programme for Centres of Excellence in RDI] [SEV-2012-0262]
  3. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wild flowers, and in particular, nectar of flowers, have been shown to be a rich reservoir of yeast biodiversity. In a taxonomic study of yeasts recovered from floral nectar in Morocco, nine strains were found to represent a novel species. Morphological and physiological characteristics and sequence analyses of the Dl/D2 region of the large subunit rRNA gene as well as the internal transcribed spacer region showed that the novel species belonged to the genus Metschnikowia. The name Metschnikowia maroccana f.a., sp. nov. (EBDCdVMor24-1(T) =CBS 15053(T) =NRRL Y-63972(T)) is proposed to accommodate this new species. Metschnikowia maroccana was isolated from floral nectar of Teucrium pseudochamaepitys, Teucrium polium and Gladiolus italicus. The ascosporic state of the novel species was not found. Metschnikowia maroccana was phylogenetically distinct from any currently recognized species and forms a well-supported subclade (bootstrap value 81 %) containing species associated with flowers and flower-visiting insects, including Metschnikowia gruessii, Metschnikowia lachancei and Metschnikowia vanudenii. The close genealogical relationship of M. maroccana with the M. gruessii Glade is also consistent with the striking similarity of their 'aeroplane' cells morphologies and the lack of utilization of the a-glucoside trehalose. The ecology of these novel species and its probable endemicity are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据