4.0 Article

Metabolic syndrome in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STD & AIDS
卷 29, 期 11, 页码 1089-1097

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0956462418775188

关键词

Antiretroviral therapy; HIV; metabolic syndrome

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [UID/Multi/04546/2013, UID/QUI/50006/2013-POCI/01/0145/FERDER/007265]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this study was to investigate the factors underlying the development of metabolic syndrome (MetS) in HIV-infected patients. Two hundred and sixty-six clinical cases were selected for a retrospective study. The sample was classified using the Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines and the identification of risk or protective factors associated with MetS evaluated via multivariate logistic or multinomial regressions. HIV-infected individuals diagnosed with MetS tend to be older, overweight, or obese (85% have a BMI25), with a waist circumference>90cm (96.5 [88.8-105.5]cm, median [interquartile range]). Blood testing these individuals revealed high fasting levels of insulin (8.1 [5.8-21.6]pg/ml), glucose (98.0 [84.0-116.0]mg/dl), triglycerides (201.0 [142.0-267.3]mg/dl), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (36.5 [29.8-43.3]mg/dl) in addition with higher levels of inflammatory mediators such as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (2.5 [1.0-4.9]mg/dl) and interleukin-6 (3.4 [2.8-3.8]pg/ml). The likelihood of HIV-infected individuals who are virally suppressed developing MetS is about 60% higher than those with acute infection. Treatment with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and protease inhibitors (PIs) increases the chance of developing MetS by around 2.4 times. Individuals with a lower antioxidant capacity (total antioxidant status [TAS] <1.33) have a 2.6 times higher risk of developing MetS. HIV-related chronic inflammation, a low TAS, and treatment with NRTIs in association with PIs are additional MetS risk factors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据