4.4 Article

The Impact of Different Competitive Environments on Pacing and Performance

出版社

HUMAN KINETICS PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.2017-0407

关键词

pacing strategy; affordance; ecological psychology; decision making; sport

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: In real-life competitive situations, athletes are required to continuously make decisions about how and when to invest their available energy resources. This study attempted to identify how different competitive environments invite elite short-track speed skaters to modify their pacing behavior during head-to-head competition. Methods: Lap times of elite 500-, 1000-and 1500-m short-track speed skating competitions between 2011 and 2016 (N = 34,095 races) were collected. Log-transformed lap and finishing times were analyzed with mixed linear models. The fixed effects in the model were sex, season, stage of competition, start position, competition importance, event number per tournament, number of competitors per race, altitude, and time qualification. The random effects of the model were athlete identity and the residual (within-athlete race-to-race variation). Separate analyses were performed for each event. Results: Several competitive environments, such as the number of competitors in a race (a higher number of competitors evoked most likely a faster initial pace; coefficient of variation [CV] = 1.9-9.3%), the stage of competition (likely to most likely, a slower initial pace was demonstrated in finals; CV = -1.4% to 2.0%), the possibility of time qualification (most likely a faster initial pace; CV = 2.6-5.0%), and competition importance (most likely faster races at the Olympics; CV = 1.3-3.5%), altered the pacing decisions of elite skaters in 1000-and 1500-m events. Stage of competition and start position affected 500-m pacing behavior. Conclusions: As demonstrated in this study, different competitive environments evoked modifications in pacing behavior, in particular in the initial phase of the race, emphasizing the importance of athleteenvironment interactions, especially during head-to-head competitions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据