4.7 Article

ALMA OBSERVATIONS OF A MISALIGNED BINARY PROTOPLANETARY DISK SYSTEM IN ORION

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 796, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/796/2/120

关键词

circumstellar matter; protoplanetary disks; stars: pre-main sequence

资金

  1. NSF [AST-1208911]
  2. National Research Council of Canada
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  5. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [1208911, 1313188] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  7. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [1108907] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present Atacama Large Millimeter/Submillimeter Array (ALMA) observations of a wide binary system in Orion, with projected separation 440 AU, in which we detect submillimeter emission from the protoplanetary disks around each star. Both disks appear moderately massive and have strong line emission in CO 3-2, HCO+ 4-3, and HCN 3-2. In addition, CS 7-6 is detected in one disk. The line-to-continuum ratios are similar for the two disks in each of the lines. From the resolved velocity gradients across each disk, we constrain the masses of the central stars, and show consistency with optical-infrared spectroscopy, both indicative of a high mass ratio similar to 9. The small difference between the systemic velocities indicates that the binary orbital plane is close to face-on. The angle between the projected disk rotation axes is very high, similar to 72 degrees, showing that the system did not form from a single massive disk or a rigidly rotating cloud core. This finding, which adds to related evidence from disk geometries in other systems, protostellar outflows, stellar rotation, and similar recent ALMA results, demonstrates that turbulence or dynamical interactions act on small scales well below that of molecular cores during the early stages of star formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据