A Second Rebuttal On Health

This essay replies to critics since 1995 of my biostatistical theory (BST) of health. According to the BST, a pathological condition is a state of statistically species-subnormal biological part-functional ability, relative to sex and age. Theoretical health, the total absence of pathological conditions, is then a value-free scientific notion. Recent critics offer a mixture of old and new objections to this analysis. Some new ones relate to choice of reference class, situation-specificity of function, common diseases and healthy populations, improvements in population health, the practice of pathologists, Cambridge changes in health status, and comparative vs. absolute health concepts. I make no changes in doctrine, except to consider treating normal aging as pathological by taking young adults as the standard for all adults.