4.7 Article

Biophysical Modeling of In Vivo Glioma Response After Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy in a Murine Model of Brain Cancer

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.12.004

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute [R01CA138599, R01NS049251, R01CA186193, R21CA169387, R25CA092043, P30CA68485, U01CA174706, K25CA204599]
  2. Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas [RR160005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To develop and investigate a set of biophysical models based on a mechanically coupled reaction-diffusion model of the spatiotemporal evolution of tumor growth after radiation therapy. Methods and Materials: Post-radiation therapy response is modeled using a cell death model (M-d), a reduced proliferation rate model (M-p), and cell death and reduced proliferation model (M-dp). To evaluate each model, rats (n = 12) with C6 gliomas were imaged with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and contrast-enhanced MRI at 7 time points over 2 weeks. Rats received either 20 or 40 Gy between the third and fourth imaging time point. Diffusion-weighted MRI was used to estimate tumor cell number within enhancing regions in contrast-enhanced MRI data. Each model was fit to the spatiotemporal evolution of tumor cell number from time point 1 to time point 5 to estimate model parameters. The estimated model parameters were then used to predict tumor growth at the final 2 imaging time points. The model prediction was evaluated by calculating the error in tumor volume estimates, average surface distance, and voxel-based cell number. Results: For both the rats treated with either 20 or 40 Gy, significantly lower error in tumor volume, average surface distance, and voxel-based cell number was observed for the M-dp and M-p models compared with the M-d model. The M-dp model fit, however, had significantly lower sum squared error compared with the M-p and Md models. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that for both doses, the M-p and M-dp models result in accurate predictions of tumor growth, whereas the Md model poorly describes response to radiation therapy. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据