4.7 Article

The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2018.1488086

关键词

supply chain dynamics; supply chain risk management; supply chain resilience; supply chain design; supply chain engineering; Industry 4.0; additive manufacturing; blockchain; big data analytics; ripple effect

资金

  1. RFBS grants [17-29-07073-ofi-m]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [16-19-00199]
  3. Ministry of education and science [2.3135.2017/4.6, 0073-2018-0003]
  4. Russian Science Foundation [16-19-00199] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The impact of digitalisation and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and disruption risk control analytics in the supply chain (SC) is studied. The research framework combines the results from two isolated areas, i.e. the impact of digitalisation on SC management (SCM) and the impact of SCM on the ripple effect control. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that connects business, information, engineering and analytics perspectives on digitalisation and SC risks. This paper does not pretend to be encyclopedic, but rather analyses recent literature and case-studies seeking to bring the discussion further with the help of a conceptual framework for researching the relationships between digitalisation and SC disruptions risks. In addition, it emerges with an SC risk analytics framework. It analyses perspectives and future transformations that can be expected in transition towards cyber-physical SCs. With these two frameworks, this study contributes to the literature by answering the questions of (1) what relations exist between big data analytics, Industry 4.0, additive manufacturing, advanced trace & tracking systems and SC disruption risks; (2) how digitalisation can contribute to enhancing ripple effect control; and (3) what digital technology-based extensions can trigger the developments towards SC risk analytics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据