4.7 Article

Universally scaling Hall-Petch-like relationship in metallic glass matrix composites

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLASTICITY
卷 105, 期 -, 页码 225-238

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2018.02.015

关键词

Metallic glasses composites; Tension ductility; Work hardening; Hall-fetch-like relationship; Mean-field theory

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51371122]
  2. Youth Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province, China [2015021005]
  3. National Science Foundation [DMR-1611180]
  4. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory [DE-FE-0008855, DE-FE-0024054, DE-FE-0011194]
  5. ERC Advanced Grant INTELHYB [ERC-2013-ADG-340025]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ti-based metallic glass matrix composites (MGMCs) with a composition of TisoZr2oVioCu5Beis (atomic percent, at. %) exhibit excellent tensile ductility and distinct work-hardening capability. A dislocation pile-up model (DPM) has been established to elaborate the dislocation motion near the yield point and to theoretically derive a linear Hall-Petch-like relationship between the yield strength, a, and the inverse square root of the diameter of dendrite arms, d(-1/2). The materials constant, k, in the present Hall-Petch-like relationship can be calculated on the basis of the pileup model, and is very close to the experimental value. The hardness variation in the dendrites and the strengthening effect from unloading-reloading tests prove the reasonability of the DPM during tension. The Hall-Petch-like relationship is verified for a variety of MGMCs, whose plastic deformation is only dominated by dislocation motion. Mean-field theory (MFf) has been first utilized to build a relationship between the critical diameter of dendrites, dc, and the composition in MGMCs with the similar atomic percentages of low solubility elements. By tuning the composition, one can universally scale the Hall-Petch-like relationship, and accurately predict the yield strength of such in-situ MGMCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据