4.7 Article

Development of itaconic acid-based molecular imprinted polymers using supercritical fluid technology for pH-triggered drug delivery

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
卷 542, 期 1-2, 页码 125-131

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.03.010

关键词

Supercritical carbon dioxide; Molecular imprinting; Crosslinked polymer; pH-responsive; Metronidazole

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia, Ministerio da Ciencia, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior (FCT/MCTES), Portugal [PTDC/QEQ-PRS/2757/2012]
  2. Principal Investigator-FCT [IF/00915/2014]
  3. FCT/MCTES [UID/QUI/50006/2013]
  4. ERDF [POCI-01-0145-FEDER - 007265]
  5. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/QEQ-PRS/2757/2012] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel pH-responsive molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) based on Itaconic acid: Ethylene glycol dimethacrylate was developed as a potential body-friendly oral drug delivery system for metronidazole (MZ), a pH-independent drug. MIP performance was evaluated in a simulated oral administration situation, at pHs 2.2 and 7.4. Itaconic acid-based copolymers were synthesized using two different molar ratios of template: monomer:crosslinker (T:M:C), 1:5:25 and 1:5:50, in supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO(2)) in high yields. Further, impregnation of MZ was performed in scCO(2) environment. Morphological and chemical properties of the copolymers produced were assessed by SEM, Morphologi G3 and FTIR analyses. Non-molecularly imprinted polymer (NIP) matrices presented swelling over time in opposition to the molecularly imprinted ones. In the scCO(2)-impregnation process, MIPs showed a significant molecular recognition towards MZ, presenting higher drug uptake ability with MZ loading of 18-61 wt% in MIPs, compared to 7-20 wt% in NIPs. In vitro drug release experiments presented different release profiles at the different pHs, where MZ-MIPs could release higher amounts of MZ at the lowest pH than at pH 7.4.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据