4.7 Article

ORBITAL CIRCULARIZATION OF A PLANET ACCRETING DISK GAS: THE FORMATION OF DISTANT JUPITERS IN CIRCULAR ORBITS BASED ON A CORE ACCRETION MODEL

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 797, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/797/1/1

关键词

accretion, accretion disks; planetary systems; planets and satellites: formation

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [23103005]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23103005, 23103001] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, gas giant planets in nearly circular orbits with large semimajor axes (a similar to 30-1000 AU) have been detected by direct imaging. We have investigated orbital evolution in a formation scenario for such planets, based on a core accretion model. (1) Icy cores accrete from planetesimals at less than or similar to 30 AU, (2) they are scattered outward by an emerging nearby gas giant to acquire highly eccentric orbits, and (3) their orbits are circularized through the accretion of disk gas in outer regions, where they spend most of their time. We analytically derived equations to describe the orbital circularization through gas accretion. Numerical integrations of these equations show that the eccentricity decreases by a factor of more than 5 while the planetary mass increases by a factor of 10. Because runaway gas accretion increases planetary mass by similar to 10-300, the orbits are sufficiently circularized. On the other hand, a is reduced at most only by a factor of two, leaving the planets in the outer regions. If the relative velocity damping by shock is considered, the circularization slows down, but is still efficient enough. Therefore, this scenario potentially accounts for the formation of observed distant jupiters in nearly circular orbits. If the apocenter distances of the scattered cores are larger than the disk sizes, their a shrink to a quarter of the disk sizes; the a-distribution of distant giants could reflect the outer edges of the disks in a similar way that those of hot jupiters may reflect inner edges.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据