4.3 Article

Improving Registration of Augmented Reality by Incorporating DCNNS into Visual SLAM

出版社

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0218001418550224

关键词

SLAM; deep learning; semantic segmentation; augmented reality

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFB1004902]
  2. Science and Technology Plan Project of Guangdong [2016A040403108, 2017B020210009]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61705045]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Augmented reality (AR) by analyzing the characteristics of the scene, the computer-generated geometric information which can be added to the real environment in the way of visual fusion, reinforces the perception of the world. Three-dimensional (3D) registration is one of the core issues of in AR. The key issue is to estimate the visual sensor's posture in the 3D environment and figure out the objects in the scene. Recently, computer vision has made significant progress, but the registration based on natural feature points in 3D space for AR system is still a severe problem. There is the difficulty of working out the mobile camera's posture in the 3D scene precisely due to the unstable factors, such as the image noise, changing light and the complex background pattern. Therefore, to design a stable, reliable and efficient scene recognition algorithm is still very challenging work. In this paper, we propose an algorithm which combines Visual Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) and Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (DCNNS) to boost the performance of AR registration. Semantic segmentation is a dense prediction task which aims to predict categories for each pixel in an image when applying to AR registration, and it will be able to narrow the searching range of the feature point between the two frames thus enhancing the stability of the system. Comparative experiments in this paper show that the semantic scene information will bring a revolutionary breakthrough to the AR interaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据