4.6 Article

Organizational home care models across Europe: A cross sectional study

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES
卷 77, 期 -, 页码 39-45

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.09.013

关键词

Delivery of health care; Europe; Home care services; Organizational care models

类别

资金

  1. FP7 [305912]
  2. Seventh Framework Programme (CORDIS FP7) of the European Commission, 30 HEALTH [FP7-HEALTH-2012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Decision makers are searching for models to redesign home care and to organize health care in a more sustainable way. Objectives: The aim of this study is to identify and characterize home care models within and across European countries by means of structural characteristics and care processes at the policy and the organization level. Data sources: At the policy level, variables that reflected variation in health care policy were included based on a literature review on the home care policy for older persons in six European countries: Belgium, Finland, Germany, Iceland, Italy, and the Netherlands. At the organizational level, data on the structural characteristics and the care processes were collected from 36 home care organizations by means of a survey. Data were collected between 2013 and 2015 during the IBenC project. Study design: An observational, cross sectional, quantitative design was used. The analyses consisted of a principal component analysis followed by a hierarchical cluster analysis. Results: Fifteen variables at the organizational level, spread across three components, explained 75.4% of the total variance. The three components made it possible to distribute home care organizations into six care models that differ on the level of patient-centered care delivery, the availability of specialized care professionals, and the level of monitoring care performance. Policy level variables did not contribute to distinguishing between home care models. Conclusions: Six home care models were identified and characterized. These models can be used to describe best practices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据