4.5 Article

Direct Simulation Monte-Carlo predictions of coarse elastic particle statistics in fully developed turbulent channel flows: Comparison with deterministic discrete particle simulation results and moment closure assumptions

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIPHASE FLOW
卷 108, 期 -, 页码 25-41

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2018.06.005

关键词

DSMC; Gas-particle vertical flow; Second-order moment method

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper presents numerical simulations of particle-laden fully developed turbulent channel flows performed in a stochastic Lagrangian framework. The particle inertia is large in order to neglect the effect of the turbulent gas motion on the particle dispersion. In contrast the inter-particle collisions are important and accounted for by using Direct Simulation Monte-Carlo (DSMC) method. The comparison of the Monte-Carlo results with those obtained by Discrete Particle Simulation (DPS) shows that the stochastic collisions algorithm is able to predict accurately the particle statistics (number density, mean velocity, second- and third-order velocity moments) in the core flow. More, the paper analyses the number sections needed for accurate predictions. In the very near-wall region, the Monte-Carlo simulation fails to account for the wall shelter effect due to the wall-normal unbalanced inter-particle collisions influence induced by the presence of the wall. Then, the paper shows that DSMC permits to assess the closure approximations required in moment approach. In particular, the DSMC results are compared with the corresponding moment closure assumptions for the third-order correlations of particle velocity, the correlations between the drag force and the velocity and the inter-particle collision terms. It is shown that at the opposite of the standard DSMC, the moment approach can predict the wall shelter effect. Finally, a model for the mean transverse force is proposed for taking into account wall shelter effect in DSMC. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据