4.7 Article

Identification, Expression Analysis of the Hsf Family, and Characterization of Class A4 in Sedum Alfredii Hance under Cadmium Stress

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms19041216

关键词

Sedum alfredii Hance; heat shock transcription factor (Hsf); cadmium stress; class A4

资金

  1. National Nonprofit Institute Research Grant of CAF [RISF2016002, TGB2013008, RISF2014010]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31200465]
  3. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2013AA102701-3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sedum alfredii Hance, a cadmium (Cd)/zinc (Zn)/lead (Pb) co-hyperaccumulating species, is a promising phytoremediation candidate because it accumulates substantial amounts of heavy metal ions without showing any obvious signs of poisoning. The heat shock transcription factor (Hsf) family plays crucial roles in plant growth, development, and stress responses. Although the roles of some Hsfs in abiotic stress have been well studied in model plants, the Hsf family has not been systematically investigated in heavy metal hyperaccumulators. Here, we comprehensively analyzed the Hsf gene family in S. alfredii based on a transcriptome under Cd stress. There were 22 Hsf members that were identified and phylogenetically clustered into three classes, namely, SaHsfA, SaHsfB, and SaHsfC. All of the three classes shared similar motifs. The expression profiles of the 22 Hsf members showed significant differences: 18 SaHsfs were responsive to Cd stress, as were multiple SaHsp genes, including SaHsp18.1, SaHsp22, SaHsp26.5, SaHsp70, SaHsp90, and SaHsp101. Two class A4 members, SaHsfA4a and SaHsfA4c, exhibited transcriptional activation activities. Overexpression of SaHsfA4a and SaHsfA4c in transgenic yeast indicated an improved tolerance to Cd stress and Cd accumulation. Our results suggest SaHsfs play important regulatory roles in heavy metal stress responses, and provide a reference for further studies on the mechanism of heavy metal stress regulation by SaHsfs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据