4.7 Article

Functionally graded microbeams: Simultaneous presence of imperfection and viscoelasticity

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES
卷 140, 期 -, 页码 339-350

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.02.037

关键词

Functionally graded material; Viscoelasticity; Nonlinearity; Imperfection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As the first endeavour, the coupled nonlinear mechanical behaviour of extensible functionally graded microbeams, when both viscoelasticity and imperfection are present, is investigated. The imperfect viscoelastic microbeam is subject to a transverse harmonic excitation load of a constant amplitude. The Kelvin-Voigt viscoelastic model and Mori-Tanaka homogenisation method are used together in order to describe the internal energy loss and the variation of the material properties of the microsystem along the transverse direction, respectively. The geometric imperfection is modelled by imposing an initial curvature in the transverse deformation of the viscoelastic microscale beam. Using the Euler-Bernoulli strain-displacement relations, the geometric nonlinearity is taken into account. The non-classical nonlinear equations of motion are derived on the basis of Hamilton's principle and the modified couple stress theory. The resulting equations are found to be coupled between transverse and longitudinal oscillations. Galerkin's technique and the method of pseudo-arclength continuation as well as direct time-integration approach are finally employed to solve the governing differential equations for oscillation frequencies and nonlinear dynamic response. It is found that the nonlinear forced oscillations of extensible functionally graded microbeams are greatly affected by the internal energy loss together with geometric imperfection. It is shown that the simultaneous presence of viscoelasticity and geometric imperfections governs both the amplitude and softness/hardness of the dynamical behaviour. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据