4.7 Article

Condensin promotes the juxtaposition of DNA flanking its loading site in Bacillus subtilis

期刊

GENES & DEVELOPMENT
卷 29, 期 15, 页码 1661-1675

出版社

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gad.265876.115

关键词

lengthwise condensation; Hi-C; DNA segregation; SMC; mitosis; ParB; parS

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [GM086466, GM073831, GM082899]
  2. National Human Genome Research Institute [HG003143, HG007010]
  3. NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE [U54HG007010, R01HG003143] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM073831, R01GM086466, R01GM082899] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

SMC condensin complexes play a central role in compacting and resolving replicated chromosomes in virtually all organisms, yet how they accomplish this remains elusive. In Bacillus subtilis, condensin is loaded at centromeric parS sites, where it encircles DNA and individualizes newly replicated origins. Using chromosome conformation capture and cytological assays, we show that condensin recruitment to origin-proximal parS sites is required for the juxtaposition of the two chromosome arms. Recruitment to ectopic parS sites promotes alignment of large tracks of DNA flanking these sites. Importantly, insertion of parS sites on opposing arms indicates that these zip-up interactions only occur between adjacent DNA segments. Collectively, our data suggest that condensin resolves replicated origins by promoting the juxtaposition of DNA flanking parS sites, drawing sister origins in on themselves and away from each other. These results are consistent with a model in which condensin encircles the DNA flanking its loading site and then slides down, tethering the two arms together. Lengthwise condensation via loop extrusion could provide a generalizable mechanism by which condensin complexes act dynamically to individualize origins in B. subtilis and, when loaded along eukaryotic chromosomes, resolve them during mitosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据