4.3 Article

PTR-ToF-MS product ion distributions and humidity-dependence of biogenic volatile organic compounds

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijms.2018.05.003

关键词

PTR-ToF-MS; Product ion distribution; Monoterpene; Sesquiterpene; Humidity-dependence; BVOC

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) [335478]
  2. Academy of Finland Center of Excellence programme [307331]
  3. University of Eastern Finland Doctoral Program in Environmental Physics, Health and Biology
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [335478] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quantitative proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometer (PTR-MS) measurements of ambient volatile organic compounds (VOCs) require proper calibration procedures. In particular, compound product ion distribution and humidity-dependent responses must be characterized. In this study, we generated twelve gas-phase terpenoid standards using a dynamic dilution system to calibrate the PTR-MS with time of-flight mass spectrometer (PTR-ToF-MS): six monoterpenes, two monoterpene derivatives, and four sesquiterpenes. The humidity-dependent response was characterized for three terpenoid compounds to compare different molecular structures: alpha-pinene, delta-limonene, and longifolene. We provide the first comprehensive summary of PTR-ToF-MS product ion distributions for twelve common biogenic volatile organic compounds using two different reduced electric field (E/N) values, 80 Td and 130 Td. Results demonstrated that neglecting to correct for individual product ion distributions of different terpenoid isomers can result in an error of up to 26% for reported mixing ratios. delta-Limonene and longifolene exhibited a small humidity-dependent response in the PTR-ToF-MS, but this did not contribute significantly to the overall measurement error. These results will improve quantification of commonly-measured biogenic volatile organic compound emissions and chemistry in the atmosphere. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据