4.7 Article

Immunogenicity and safety of a single dose of a live attenuated Japanese encephalitis chimeric virus vaccine in Vietnam: A single-arm, single-center study

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2017.10.010

关键词

JE-CV; IMOJEV (R); Live attenuated Japanese encephalitis vaccine; Vietnam; Japanese encephalitis

资金

  1. Sanofi Pasteur

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To describe the immunogenicity and safety of the Japanese encephalitis chimeric virus vaccine (JE-CV) in children and adults in Vietnam. Methods: In this prospective, open-label, single-center, single-arm study, 250 healthy participants aged 9 months to 60 years received a single dose of JE-CV (IMOJEV (R)). JE neutralizing antibody titers were assessed at baseline and 28 days after vaccination using the 50% plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT50). Safety and reactogenicity were assessed through solicited and unsolicited adverse events. Findings: Seroconversion (titer >= 10 [1/dil] in participants JE seronegative [titer < 10] at baseline [per protocol analysis], or a 4-fold rise from a baseline titer >= 10) and seroprotection (titer >= 10 [1/dil]) rates 28 days after vaccination were both 98.5% (132/134) in the per protocol analysis, and 82.4% (201/244) and 98.8% (242/245), respectively, in the full analysis set. Geometric mean titers (GMTs) increased in all age groups from Day 0 to Day 28; Day 28/Day 0 GMT ratios were 55.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 38.4-79.8), 348 (95% CI 211-572), 296 (95% CI 152-576) and 194 (95% CI 13.1-2870) in those aged 9 months to 4 years, 5-11 years, 12-17 years and 18-60 years, respectively, in the per protocol analysis. There were no safety concerns during the study. Conclusion: A single dose of JE-CV in children and adults aged 9 months to 60 years in Vietnam elicited a protective immune response and was well tolerated with no safety concerns. (C) 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据