4.5 Article

Performance improvement of green cars by using variable-geometry engines

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ENERGY INSTITUTE
卷 87, 期 4, 页码 393-400

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.joei.2014.03.017

关键词

Variable valve geometry; Valve lift and throat; Spark ignition engines; Emissions reduction; Green cars

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The spark ignition engine is the most widely used in land transport sector. Hence, studies to predict and improve its behavior continue to be essential. The behavior of the intake and exhaust systems is important because these systems govern the air flow into the engine's cylinders. Inducting the maximum air flow at full load at any given speed and retaining that mass within the engine's cylinders is a primary design goal. The higher the air flow, the larger the amount of fuel that can be burned and the greater the power produced. The important parameter is the volumetric efficiency along with equal air flows to each engine cylinder. The valves and ports, which together provide the major restriction to intake and exhaust flows, largely decouple the manifolds from the cylinders. In this work it was intended to find out the effect of variable valve lift and throat diameter on the performance of the SI engine, namely volumetric efficiency, power, brake specific fuel consumption, and pollutants. Hence, it contributes toward having greener cars in the future. A specially designed computer program (Lotus) was used to predict the gas flows, combustion and overall performance. The results of this investigation show that increasing the valve lift is relatively more effective than throat diameter in boosting volumetric efficiency and power and reducing specific fuel consumption, nitrogen oxide and carbon monoxide emissions. A 10% increase in valve lift resulted in an improvement of 1.8% in eta v, 3.3% in power and a decrease of 1.5% in BSFC and (0.3-0.8)% in engine emissions. However, a 10% increase in valve throat diameter causes 50% less effects than the valve lift. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Energy Institute.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据