4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Harmonising methodological choices in life cycle assessment of hydrogen: A focus on acidification and renewable hydrogen

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 44, 期 35, 页码 19426-19433

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.03.101

关键词

Acidification; Carbon footprint; Harmonisation; Life cycle assessment; Renewable hydrogen; Steam methane reforming

资金

  1. Regional Government of Madrid [S2013/MAE-2882]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness [ENE2015-74607-JIN AEI/FEDER/UE]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The environmental sustainability of hydrogen energy systems is often evaluated through Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). In particular, environmental suitability is usually determined by comparing the life-cycle indicators calculated for a specific hydrogen energy system with those of a reference system (e.g., conventional hydrogen from steam methane reforming, SMR-H-2). In this respect, harmonisation protocols for comparative LCA of hydrogen energy systems have recently been developed in order to avoid misleading conclusions in terms of carbon footprints and cumulative energy demand. This article expands the scope of these harmonisation initiatives by addressing a new life-cycle indicator: acidification. A robust protocol for harmonising the acidification potential of hydrogen energy systems is developed and applied to both SMR-H-2 and a sample of case studies of renewable hydrogen. According to the results, unlike other energy systems, there is no correlation between acidification and carbon footprint in the case of hydrogen energy systems, which prevents the estimation of harmonised acidification results from available harmonised carbon footprints. Nevertheless, an initial library of harmonised life cycle indicators of renewable hydrogen is now made available. (C) 2018 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据