4.3 Article

Generalized holographic Ricci dark energy and generalized second law of thermodynamics in Bianchi Type I universe

期刊

GENERAL RELATIVITY AND GRAVITATION
卷 47, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10714-015-1983-4

关键词

Second law of thermodynamics; Bianchi Type I universe; Generalized holographic Ricci dark energy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11565016, 11405076]
  2. Science Foundation of the Education Department of Yunnan Province [2014Y066]
  3. Talent Cultivation Foundation of Kunming University of Science and Technology [KKSY201207053, KKSY201356060]
  4. Funds of the Introduced High-level Talents of Yunnan Province from the Department of Human Resources and Social Security of Yunnan Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Generalized second law of thermodynamics in the Bianchi Type I universe with the generalized holographic Ricci dark energy model is studied in this paper. The behavior of dark energy's equation of state parameter indicates that it is matter-like in the early time of the universe but phantom-like in the future. By analysing the evolution of the deviations of state parameter and the total pressure of the universe, we find that for an anisotropic Bianchi Type I universe, it transits from a high anisotropy stage to a more homogeneous stage in the near past. Using the normal entropy given by Gibbs' law of thermodynamics, it is proved that the generalized second law of thermodynamics does not always satisfied throughout the history of the universe when we assume the universe is enclosed by the generalized Ricci scalar radius R-gr. It becomes invalid in the near past to the future, and the formation of the galaxies will be helpful in explaining such phenomenon, for that the galaxies's formation is an entropy increase process. The negative change rate of the horizon entropy and internal entropy occur in different period indicates that the influences of galaxies formation is wiped from internal to the universe's horizon.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据