4.7 Article

Comprehensive performance enhancement of polybenzimidazole based high temperature proton exchange membranes by doping with a novel intercalated proton conductor

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 43, 期 21, 页码 9994-10003

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.04.089

关键词

High temperature proton exchange membrane; Polybenzimidazole; Hydrogen bonding network; Intercalated proton conductor; Proton conductivity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21776167, 21276148]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering (Tianjin University) [SKL-ChE-14B01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

On the study of high temperature proton exchange membrane (HTPEM), the trade-off between proton conductivity and physico-chemical property (such as mechanical strength, dimensional stability and methanol resistance) remained a main obstacle for comprehensive performance enhancement. To address this issue, novel HTPEM was prepared by doping phosphotungstic acid intercalated ferric sulfophenyl phosphate (FeSPP-PWA) into polybenzimidazole (PBI) via hot pressed method. Intense hydrogen bonding network was built between PBI and FeSPP-PWA, rendering construction of proton channels and reinforcement of physico-chemical property. As a novel proton conductor, FeSPP-PWA facilitated formation of efficient proton transfer pathway. The layered morphology and inorganic intrinsity of FeSPP-PWA also improved the mechanical and dimensional stability while reducing the methanol permeability of the PBI/FeSPP-PWA membranes. The composite membrane exhibited good thermal stability up to 200 degrees C. The proton conductivity of PBI/FeSPP-PWA (30 wt%) reached 110 mS cm(-1) at 170 degrees C and 100% RH, and was 69.3 mS cm(-1) at 180 degrees C and 50% RH. The PBI/FeSPP-PWA also showed low methanol permeability and high membrane selectivity for application in direct methanol fuel cells. (C) 2018 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据