4.7 Article

Parametric study on Tesla valve with reverse flow for hydrogen decompression

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 43, 期 18, 页码 8888-8896

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.03.014

关键词

Hydrogen decompression; Pressure drop; Tesla valve; Structural parameter; Computational fluid dynamics

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, China [LZ17E050002]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2018QNA4013]
  3. Open Foundation of the State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems [GZKF-201603]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recharge mileage is of great importance for a hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicle. High pressure hydrogen storage can increase the recharge mileage significantly. Before hydrogen flows into the fuel cell, a decompression process is necessary. To overcome the seal of the piping system and realize the decompression, Tesla valve can be well used, since it is a type of check valve without moving parts, and when there is a reverse flow, large pressure drop appears between the inlet and outlet. In order to obtain a better pressure drop performance for a Tesla valve, in this paper, the structural parameters including the hydraulic diameter, the valve angle, and the inner curve radius are investigated for a large range of inlet velocities. The results indicate that a small hydraulic diameter and small inner curve radius but large valve angle can provide a higher pressure drop under a large inlet velocity, while the pressure drop under different structural parameters barely changes under a small inlet velocity (less than 100 m/s). Besides, there is a low-pressure zone behind the outlet of the bend channel, which should be paid attention. This work can be referred by the further applications of Tesla valves in hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles for hydrogen decompression. (C) 2018 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据