4.7 Article

Error of Darcy's law for serpentine flow fields: An analytical approach

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 43, 期 13, 页码 6686-6695

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.02.070

关键词

Darcy's law; Modified Darcy's law; Gas diffusion layer; Pressure drop; Under-land cross-flow; PEM fuel cell

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Serpentine flow fields and other flow fields with partial under-land cross-flow are commonly used in various energy devices, such as proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells and redox flow batteries, due to their higher mass transfer rate to reaction sites and better product removal capability. Accurately predicting the under-land cross-flow rate and pressure drop in such flow fields is crucial in flow field design optimizations. Darcy's law is the most commonly used model in predicting the under-land cross-flow and pressure drop in such flow fields. However, since the Darcy's law neglects inertial effect, its validity in different designs and operating conditions needs to be carefully studied. In this work, mathematical models for a serpentine flow field are developed based on both the Darcy's law and a modified Darcy's law that includes the inertial effect. Both models are solved and analytical solutions are obtained. The predicted pressure drops and under-land cross-flow rates from the two models are compared with experimental data and the results show that under some conditions, both the Darcy's law and the modified Darcy's law can predict pressure drop and under-land cross-flow rate reasonably well. However, under other conditions the Darcy's law can result in significantly large errors in predicting both pressure drop and under-land cross-flow rates. Further studies provide the variations of errors from the Darcy's law with different parameters, including channel length, gas diffusion layer (GDL) thickness, land width, inlet flow rate, GDL permeability and GDL inertial coefficient. (C) 2018 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据